|
(It has been five years
since the International Federation
introduced its Strategy 2010. This
year the Federation carried out a
mid-term evaluation of the Strategy.
The Strategy brings out various case
studies on different aspects. Nepal
Red Cross Society has been selected
for a case study on partnership. The
case study has been reproduced here.)
The Nepal Red Cross Society (NRCS)
is the largest humanitarian organization
in Nepal with partnerships that span
the UN and international organizations,
numerous National Societies, and relevant
government departments. Since 1996,
the country has been embroiled in
an internal conflict in which Maoist
rebels are fighting against the current
political system. As a result, most
districts in the country are conflict
affected. NRCS, by maintaining neutrality,
has been able to continue to work
throughout the country.
Over the past 20 years, the concept
of partnership within the Federation
has been interpreted in many ways
with the dawning realization that
‘partnership’, meaning
equity in the relationship, is often
difficult to realize in practice.
There is the sense that money is considered
the most important resource, and that
local capacity, knowledge, staff and
volunteers, access to communities
and authorities is not recognized
nor leveraged by National Societies
as an equally important commodity.
In 2003, the NRCS initiated a detailed
Cooperative Agreement Strategy (CAS)
process. The overall aim of the CAS
is to develop a framework for effective
partnership with shared ownership
of responsibilities among and between
partners both inside and outside the
Movement. Within this process, partnership
has been explored from the NRCS perspective
as well as partners’ themselves
with the goal to arrive at common
understanding.
“Partnerships do not mean
you giving and us taking—it
is about what needs exist and how
we work together to provide for these
needs,” stated Mr. Dhakhwa,
NRCS Secretary General. “Partnerships
must adhere to our strategies and
partnerships must be on equal footing.
Essential components of this include
first having your own vision and development
plan and that the partnership be based
upon your needs and plans.”
A basic partnership premise is to
agree on principles for the partnership
and methodologies from the point of
view of both the donor and the partner.
“Remember,” Mr. Dhakhwa
notes, “the reason for mutual
advantage is to reach a common target
for meeting the needs of the vulnerable.”
The NRCS believes that this emerging
concept of mutuality has resulted
in NRCS negotiating more in its own
interest than it has previously.
Additionally, because of the country
situation, NRCS partners must adhere
to the Federation Principles. “They
provide added value, support, and
common ground. There is no compromise
on these” the Secretary General
adamantly states. Partner funding
has been rejected when not in agreement
with these principles. “We have
had to be very clear with partners
that their actions must be within
these limits. Therefore partners must
understand the Principles and know
how to act neutral and impartial and
follow the NGO Code of Conduct.”
A learning and a reality is that
partnerships are actually complicated
to implement in practice. A major
NRCS challenge, with its sheer number
of diverse partner relationships,
is that each has its own accounting,
reporting, and audit systems to ensure
upward accountability. The NRCS has
been working with its partners as
part of the CAS process to come up
with a common reporting system. To
do this, the NRCS asks what is more
practical and common, most acceptable
and agreeable to all. However some
question as to whether western management
approaches and procedures, which are
a predominant partner preference,
reinforce donor domination rather
than shared learning and whether these
approaches are inappropriate to the
social and institutional context in
Nepal.
Overall, the NRCS is noted for its
openness to partners, and its ability
to manage and nurture its partner
relationships, which are considered
important reasons for the high number,
as well as long duration, of many
of NRCS partnerships. “We must
have an open mind” commented
Mr. Dhakhwa “there is much common
ground that we can share with humanity,
both here and internationally.”
|